I’m Not Really a Lumberjack and I’m Not Really OK; Angry Gambler Strikes Straight Back
Maybe Not everyone carrying an axe is really a lumberjack
Ever seen a lumberjack in a casino? Most likely not, since most lumberjacks don’t generally carry their axes around with them on nights out. But two stories have popped up in the media showing that non-lumberjacks don’t necessarily stick to these rules.
Axing For Trouble
The first of these two tales of violence happened in a town club in Fontaniva, Italy, the place where a disgruntled gambler decided to exact his revenge on some naive slots devices after losing 5,000 euros (over $6,500) in two weeks.
The father of two, aged 48, was caught on CCTV cameras, footage of which has since stormed the media and video clip websites that are streaming where viewers can watch the gambler smash up seven machines as nearby customers dive for cover.
After blowing off vapor, the device hacker calmly strolls out of the bar, but not before giving a thumbs up towards the one-armed bandits. Either this is an indication of victory, or a show of friendship towards these particular devices. Whenever working with crazy, interpretations are anybody’s guess.
The anger-released slot axe-murderer then waited calmly for arrest outside a nearby bar.
‘ He comes in here all of the time to play the machines,’ said who owns the bar, who chose probably wisely- to keep nameless. ‘ He’s had some wins, but he spends a great deal of money. He could be a laborer and only works every now and then.’ evidently, that is one worker whom keeps their own equipment handy.
‘He’s normally a tremendously man that is quiet. He just moved in very calmly having an axe and smashed all the casinopokies777.com devices. There had been a few customers they were terrified,’ he added by them at the time and.
Because of this of his strangely calm yet violent outburst, the man was sentenced for half a year for criminal damage and control of an offensive weapon. But jail overcrowding got him off with nothing significantly more than a slap on the hand.
But Wait, There’s More…
The 2nd of the two tales is a bit more frightening, due to the fact axe was wielded maybe not at the slots, but at a person in the staff at a betting shop in the Welsh capital of Cardiff.
Police reported that the ‘particularly violent’ event left the shop assistant at a Ladbrokes shop that is betting Cardiff ‘in a situation of shock.’
Before raiding the till and making off with some money, one of three suspects in the robbery was seen wielding an axe over his head, threatening the Ladbrokes’ worker with injury or worse if he did not comply.
A police spokesperson investigating the criminal activity said that two men, both ski that is wearing, entered the bookie’s store at 9:30 pm regarding the night of the incident. One calmly endured guard at the doorway, while the other violently threatened the associate with all the tree-chopping tool.
The frightened shop assistant then handed over what police called a ‘quantity of money,’ and the men fled the scene in a getaway car driven by way of a suspect that is third.
Police are now appealing to the regional public for information that could help apprehend the violent criminals, as unlike the Italian axe-wielder, they certainly did perhaps not wait calmly for arresting officers to arrive regarding the scene.
Whose Casino Can It Be Anyway? Boston and Everett, Mass. Duke It Out
The battle continues over who gets to vote on Everett casino plan
Whilst each and every of the 3 licensing battles for casino resort projects in Massachusetts has already established its share of drama, none has proven more contentious than the fight within the casino slated to be located in the greater Boston area. Now, one Boston mayoral candidate is threatening a lawsuit over one such proposal that would put a casino within the neighboring town of Everett.
The appropriate option is associated with the idea that neighboring communities is afflicted with casino projects, but won’t have an opportunity to vote on whether those casinos should really be opened in the place that is first. Suffolk District Attorney Daniel F. Conley, a candidate for mayor of Boston, happens to be one of the handful of candidates whom have recommended that most of Boston should manage to vote on a casino that would be situated in East Boston, for instance.
When it comes to the proposed Wynn casino task in Everett, Conley says that allowing only Everett residents to vote about it is unfair to the surrounding communities. Should the East Boston proposal fail, then, he would file suit to stop the Everett casino based on the impact it would have on many Boston neighborhoods.
‘The Wynn proposal had been voted…on in just one community,’ Conley said within a press conference at City Hall Plaza, ‘while residents and businesses from Charlestown to Somerville and beyond will bear its traffic, economic, and burdens that are social get none of the proposed advantages.’
According to the state laws that produced the window of opportunity for three casinos that are new Massachusetts, only communities hosting casinos actually obtain a vote on whether or not to permit the projects to be built. However, casino developers are required to negotiate settlement, with arbitration needed if the casinos and governments that are localn’t arrived at an answer by themselves.
Conley has proposed going for a path that is not really outlined in the 2011 casino law in terms of the East Boston casino proposal, one that is being produced by Caesars Entertainment and Suffolk Downs. He would have the whole city of Boston vote on whether to approve the proposal, while still giving East Boston veto power throughout the vote that is entire. The casino would have to pass votes in both East Boston alone and across the entire city in order to be approved in other words.
Yay or Nay?
A Boston Globe survey found that six of the eight mayoral candidates who answered that question were in favor of it, with just two coming out against it (with Conley and one other candidate not answering the question) while Conley has not specified whether or not he supports the East Boston casino proposal. Meanwhile, four of ten prospects supported allowing the whole town to vote on the casino, while six favored limiting the vote to simply East Boston. Another poll of Boston residents unearthed that 44% had been in support of the casino, while 37% opposed it.
Even when voters back these proposals, just one will ultimately be chosen by the state since the future site of a casino in the Boston area. Along side the Everett and East Boston casino plans, there is also a proposal that is competing Crossroads Massachusetts to place a casino in Milford.
Labour MP Disses Sports Books, Takes Donation from Retired Bookie CEO
Chuka Umunna, taken fully to task for accepting donation
Chuka Umunna, cited as the rising star of great britain’s Labour Party who has publicly announced their discontent towards the bookmaking industry got their own hand caught in the activities book cookie container after accepting a contribution of £20,000 (more than $30,000) from a retired leading sports company that is betting.
Slaps Bookies While Accepting Donation
As a betting shop critic whom has publicly decried the number of betting shops, Umunna nevertheless accepted the large contribution from chairman emeritus of the Gala Coral Group, Neil Goulden, causing people of the Conservative Party to call out the shadow business assistant, claiming Umunna is guilty of adopting double requirements.
Since Gala Coral Group is one associated with largest bookies in Britain and accounts for the number that is large of outlets, with 1,800 bookies throughout the nation- it just didn’t really read well.
Umunna has even attacked the industry directly with a campaign targeted at reducing the spread of bookies and betting stores in the area roads of his London that is south Streatham, and went as far as to promise ‘new powers to get a handle on the number of betting shops.’
‘I know there clearly was huge concern that some streets in our area are steadily replenishing with gambling shops and pay day loan companies that take advantage of our community, as opposed to help us,’ wrote Umunna in a study to local voters earlier this year.
‘ Can anyone really credibly ever believe anything Chuka Umunna claims?’ questioned Tory Party vice-chairman Bob Neill. ‘He says something in public places and does another behind closed doors. His hypocrisy seems to be limitless.’ And that’s very uncommon for a politician.
Spared on a Technicality
But, fighting back the corner regarding the Labour Party MP, a spokesperson for Umunna reported that ‘this donation was made by an individual Labour Party supporter in a individual capacity, and was accepted in accordance utilizing the rules and correctly declared.’
Officially, the donation from Goulden was registered as being made ‘to support the workplace of Chuka Umunna in his capacity as Shadow Secretary of State for Business, as well as for staffing,’ so it does officially pass as legitimate.
And even though Goulden is not mind of the Gala Coral Group of operations, the ten years he spent as managing director, chief executive and chairman of the group means he still provides consultancy services and chairs the Responsible Gaming Trust.
Whether it is a donation that is completely innocent not, and whether or not the Conservative Party that are looking to destroy the promotion of a rival MP by claiming hypocrisy, Umunna was still a bit red-faced when the news broke, especially after taking such a hard stance against the spread of the industry in their neighborhood constituency.
‘ The only thing we know he really believes is that the capital is full of ‘trash’ and ‘C-list’ wannabes,’ claimed Bob Neill.
Umunna, that is thought to be a future Labour Party leader, has recently experienced his share that is fair of as earlier this season his office ended up being accused of editing his Wikipedia page to exhibit evaluations between himself and Barack Obama.